Australian National Fund Raising Organization Association Essay

Australian National Fund Raising Organization Association - Essay Example Our group will use many techniques to raise funds for our events and they will be discussed below. Our group is planning two separate events in order to raise funds. There are two broad segments of the society that can be used to raise funds. One segment consists of adults of over 35 years of age and the other is the younger segment which comprises of young people from ages 16 to 35. Our group is planning to make use of both these segments to raise money for our fundraiser. For adults, we are planning a dinner reception where they will get a chance to socialize. In the dinner, notable members will be given a chance to say something for the cause of poverty. The dinner reception will be formal as its target market is mature adult people who will be willing to spend their money on donations. Another, often neglected in terms of fundraising, the segment of the society that can contribute to charity is the younger generation. Young people can also play a big role in raising money given that fundraising is done keeping in mind their needs. Our group is planning to hold a party for the younger population in order to raise funds for the poor. We will be selling food, drinks, and other items in the party in order to raise funds. Different techniques will be used to raise funds for both the events. Older and younger people have different demands and perceptions, and it is vital to plan fundraisers accordingly in order to raise sufficient amounts of a fund. In the dinner reception funds will be raised by tickets and donations. People will be sold tickets and they will be communicated that the money we get from the tickets will go to the charity. In the dinner reception, we will also ask people to donate money towards the cause. Speeches will be made to motivate them to raise money. In the dinner reception, we will offer people drinks, appetizers, and dinner so that people have enough time to socialize, and we can raise more and more money. Donations will be our main target because most of the money from tickets will be used to cover expenses that will be incurred in arranging for the venue and dinner for guests.  Ã‚  

Assignments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

Assignments - Essay Example The syntactic rule, on the other hand, must always govern a written message so that the reader gets the very meaning that the writer intended to convey. Johnny and Ken, in the course of exchanging words, failed to observe some of these simple rules. The whole conversation, therefore, can be seen as the abuse of language. Johnny opens the talk with an ambiguous statement that gave his roommate a leeway to using any language. Johnny asked, â€Å"Does your friend has to stay here all the time?†(n.pg).In this question, he did not clearly bring out what he meant by that. This was the ambiguous question that led to the conflict. In response to this ambiguity, Ken employed the use of inferential statement. He thought Johnny was already very mad at him and his friend. Therefore, Ken turns furious to counteract the supposed temper of Johnny. Ken replied, â€Å"You said you were chill with it before† (n.pg). This statement also shows that Ken must have used a static evaluation on Johnny. When Johnny had agreed to accommodate the friend earlier, Ken thought that he had made a permanent decision and could not change his mind whats oever. The sudden change of mind took Ken by surprise since he had never expected that from Johnny. There was also lack of euphemism in their tones. Both Ken and Johnny had poor diction. They failed to use pleasant words in place of the blunt ones. For instance, Johnny says â€Å"†¦I don’t like it. I am tired of this! You are the worst† Ken also calls Johnny â€Å"dumb† n.pg. These are emotive statements. If the two had chosen to use polite language (euphemism) on each other, they would have come to an understanding and solve their differences in a smooth way. Johnny, in his first statement, could have avoided ambiguity by politely explaining to Ken why and how his friend had become a burden. Ken could have sat down and listen